Hyde v. Mangan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This is an action of ejectment, the complaint being in the usual form. The answer makes a general denial, and then alleges certain facts in the nature of a special defense. Judgment went for the defendants in the lower court, and the case is before us *323for consideration upon an appeal from the judgment, and from the order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.
The following are substantially the findings of the court, and they are supported both by the allegations of defendants’ special defense and by the evidence: That upon the twentieth day of October, 1879, the Southern Pacific Railroad…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hicks v. LovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Bruck v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Pell v. McElroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Hughes v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Whittier v. StegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Follette v. Pacific Light & Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Domarad v. Fisher & Burke, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Kelley v. UpshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Eastman v. GurreyUtah Supreme Court · 1897
- California Cured Fruit Assn. v. StellingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.