Legal Opinion
Eggleston v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 17, 1924No. 7 Div. 462PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
This is the second appeal. Eggleston v. Wilson, 208 Ala. 167, 94 South. 108.
The suit was on account, account stated, etc. It was alleged by way of replication to defendant’s pleas that defendant Wilson held himself out to plaintiff as a partner in the business conducted in the name of Day & Night Auto Repair Company, the purchaser of the merchandise in question, and on said representation plaintiff relied in making sales thereof.
The issues of fact are somewhat similar to those on which the trials were had in Sorrell v. Scheuer, 209 Ala. 268, 96 South. 216, and Tennessee Valley Bank v. Valley…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Humes v. O'Bryan & WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Sorrell v. ScheuerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- First National Bank v. LelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Leahy v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Yarbrough v. Armour & Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1943
- Fred Gray Cotton & Gin Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Oscar Krenz Copper & Brass Works, Inc. v. EnglandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Woodson v. BumpersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.