Legal Opinion

Fred Gray Cotton & Gin Co. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 15, 1926No. 8 Div. 833PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Suit in assumpsit on the common counts by appellee against appellant. The account claimed to be due, and for the recovery of which plaintiff obtained a judgment, arose out of the purchase of certain cotton by defendant from one W. H. McClellan. In addition to the general issue, defendant pleaded payment, set-off, recoupment, and a special plea in abatement. This latter plea was to the effect there was a nonjoinder of a necessary party plaintiff, in that said McClellan was jointly interested with plaintiff (Smith) in this account.

Defendant insists there is much evidence to sustain the view…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stafford v. SibleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Watson v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Zuber v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  4. Eggleston v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Fourth National Bank v. AltheimerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tidewater Construction Co. v. Monroe CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Ard v. AbeleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Wade v. BriskerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Biddle v. Employers Ins. Co. of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Price v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API