Legal Opinion

Mulkern v. Eastern Steamship Lines, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 8, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Exceptions overruled. The plaintiff seeks in this action to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained as a result of his slipping on the defendant’s premises. There was a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff's only exception is to the following statement in the charge to the jury: “. . . the defendant would not be liable for an obvious defect if he [the plaintiff ] was an invitee. And by ‘obvious defect' I mean a defect that is *610• clearly apparent to a person of ordinary observation. It would not be expected to be liable for obvious defects. . . .” This statement must be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelley v. GoldbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Rynn v. Fox-New England Theatres, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. McGuire v. Valley Arena Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Bannister v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Knight v. Travelers Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Garner v. Atlantic Greyhound CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Benton v. United Bank Building Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Little v. Wilson Oil CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Reese v. Piedmont, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API