Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Goldberg

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 23, 1934PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff and consequential damages. The case was referred to an auditor who made findings of fact. The plaintiff’s motion for judgment was allowed and the defendants excepted.

The motion for judgment was allowed rightly. See Ballou v. Fitzpatrick, 283 Mass. 336.

The auditor found that on December 1, 1928, the plaintiff sustained personal injuries when, in attempting to get into a *81parked automobile, she fell into a greasing pit on premises leased to the defendants, “used- as a gasoline filling station and a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gordon v. CummingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  2. Ballou v. FitzpatrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. O'Connor v. HickeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Marston v. ReynoldsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Crone v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Mounsey v. EllardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Papadopoulos v. Target CorporationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. United States v. HullCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
  4. LeBlanc v. Atlantic Building & Supply Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Lasell v. Tri-States Theatre Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1943

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API