Legal Opinion
Heald v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 7, 1949No. 3791, 3792, 3793PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellants were indicted, tried, and convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado under 18 U.S.C.A. § 88 [now § 371]. The indictment charged them with conspiring to violate the False Claim Statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 80 [now §§ 287, 1001], and with conspiring to violate Title III, Servicemen’s Readjustment Act, 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 694 and 694a. Numerous assignments of error are urged for reversal.
It is first contended that the indictment was insufficient to state an offense in that it merely alleged conclusions and not facts as to the objects of the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hammerschmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Haas v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- New York Central Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. CaldwellOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Willie Lee Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- United States v. Norman Jacobs and George KastenbaumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. HissDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.