Legal Opinion
Miranda v. State Farm General Insurance Company
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided June 4, 2025No. 2:23-cv-01780Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Gilberto Miranda, et al., Case No.: 2:23-cv-01780-JAD-DJA 4 Plaintiffs Order Denying Cross Motions for Summary Judgment but Dismissing Claims of 5 v. Miranda and Terry 6 State Farm General Insurance Company and State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, [ECF Nos. 24, 25] 7 Defendants 8 9 Future Science Technology Inc. (FST) conducted a medical study to determine the 10 efficacy of an over-the-counter medication on delayed-onset muscle soreness in the days 11 following 60 participants’ short-duration, high-intensity physical exercise. Within 72…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- David P. Pagtalunan v. George Galaza, Warden Thomas Maddock, Acting Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Henderson v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alphonso Thompson v. The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.