Legal Opinion

Woodruff v. Barney

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio

Decided February 15, 1862PublishedCited by 8 opinions

[This was a suit by Theodore T. Woodruff. John S. Miller, Orville W. Childs, and George R. Dykeman against Elam E. Barney, C. Parker, S. F. Woodsum,. and J. A. .Tenney. Heard on motion to retax costs.]

1Opinion of the Court

LEAVITT, District Judge.

On the part of the plaintiffs in this case, a motion is made *519to retax tlie costs, by striking from the cost-bill the charges for mileage to such of the defendants’ witnesses residing out of this district, and more than one hundred miles from Cincinnati, as attended at the request of the defendants, and without service of process requiring their attendance. And the defendants move for a retaxation, by which they may be allowed for expenses incurred in procuring certain models and copies of patents deemed necessary in their defense.

The plaintiffs’ motion will be first…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Specialty Equipment & MacHinery Corp. v. Zell Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  2. United States v. SanbornU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1886
  3. Burrow v. Kansas City, Ft. S. & M. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1893
  4. Cornelly v. MarkwaldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
  5. T. H. Symington & Son, Inc. v. Symington Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API