Legal Opinion
Subscription Television of Greater Washington v. Kaufmann
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 24, 1985No. Civ. A. CA 84-2224PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
A. Findings of Fact
1. Plaintiff Subscription Television of Greater Washington is a general partnership organized and existing under the laws of the District of Columbia, having its principal place of business in McLean, Virginia. The remaining corporate plaintiffs (hereinafter collectively referred to as STV GW) are general partners in that venture.
2. The defendant, A. Bart Kaufmann, is a citizen of the State of New Jersey, trading as A.B. Kaufmann Associates, and/or New Video Engineering, unincorporated business…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Leonard Davis v. Theodor SchuchatCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. McNuttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Oceanic Cablevision, Inc. v. M.D. ElectronicsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1991
- Time Warner Cable v. Freedom Electronics, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1995
- Time Warner Cable v. Cable Box Wholesalers, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1996
- Storer Communications, Inc. v. MogelDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.