Legal Opinion
Time Warner Cable v. Cable Box Wholesalers, Inc.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 29, 1996No. CV 95-703 TUC JMRPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROLL, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on certain claims made pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 553. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment is granted.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Time Warner Cable of New York City.
Plaintiff, TIME WARNER CABLE OF NEW YORK CITY (“Time Warner”), provides cable television programming in certain geographical areas, including Manhattan and Queens in New York City. Cable services provided include basic cable programming, premium programming, and Pay Per View. Time Warner…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Triton Energy Corp. v. Square D Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- On/tv of Chicago v. Archie Ward JulienCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Time Warner Cable of New York City v. Googies Luncheonette, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Continental Cablevision, Inc. v. PollCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- KingVision Pay Per View, Ltd. v. Boom Town Saloon, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Time Warner Entertainment/Advance-Newhouse Partnership v. Worldwide Electronics, L.C.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1999
- Intermedia Partners Southeast, General Partnership v. QB Distributors L.L.C.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.