Legal Opinion
Aeronautical Indus. Dist. Lodge 91 of the Int'l Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. United Technologies Corp., Pratt & Whitney
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 18, 2000No. Civ.A.3:99CV1827 (JCH)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALL, District Judge.
Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 91 of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL— CIO (“the Union”) brings this action against United Technologies Corporation, Pratt & Whitney (“Pratt”), alleging that Pratt’s proposed restructuring violates the parties’ collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) in two respects. First, the Union claims that Pratt’s plans to transfer work out of Connecticut violate Letter 22 of the CBA, which letter provides that Pratt will make “every effort” to keep certain work within the bargaining unit. The Union…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 91 of The International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 91 v. United Technologies Corporation, Pratt & WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- District Lodge 26 of the International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2010