Legal Opinion
District Lodge 26 of the International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. United Technologies Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 17, 2010No. Civil Action 3:09-cv-1494 (JCH)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED BENCH TRIAL RULING 1
JANET C. HALL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, District Lodge 26 of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO (“District 26”), brings this action against defendant United Technologies Corporation, Pratt & Whitney (“Pratt”), alleging that Pratt’s proposed restructuring plans violate the parties’ collective bargaining agreement (“CBA,” or “Agreement”) in two respects. First, District 26 claims that Pratt’s plan for the transfer of work from, and closure of, its Cheshire Engine Center (“Cheshire”) and its Connecticut…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- De La Concha of Hartford, Inc. v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- John Koufakis v. Thomas Carvel and Franchise Licensors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Bank of China v. David C.W. ChanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Leasco Corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Peter T. TaussigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- District Lodge 26 v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- White v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011