Legal Opinion
Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 91 of The International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO v. United Technologies Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 26, 2000No. Docket No. 00-7168PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN M. WALKER, Jr., Chief Judge:
Defendant-appellant United Technologies Corporation, Pratt & Whitney Division (hereinafter “Pratt” or “the Company”) appeals from two decisions of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Janet C. Hall, District Judge): (1) the January 6, 2000, denial of the Company’s motion to dismiss the claim by plaintiff-appellee Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 91 (hereinafter “the Union”) that Pratt’s proposed transfer of certain work outside the bargaining unit would violate the collective bargaining agreement, see Aeronautical Indus.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Buffalo Forge Co. v. United SteelworkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 91 v. United Technologies Corporation, Pratt & WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Bond v. City of MiddletownDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Krakowski v. American Airlines, Inc. (In re AMR Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- District Lodge 26 of the International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Heffernan v. ICARE MANAGEMENT, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.