Legal Opinion
Ryan v. Welte
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 13, 1948No. Civ. 13703PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Appeal 1 by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendants on the pleadings. While the judgment followed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, it is obvious from the record that the judgment was, in effect, one after a demurrer to the second amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend.
The action is for the purpose of establishing a trust in favor of plaintiff in certain properties standing of record at the time of his death in the name of Daniel McSweeney, deceased, of whose estate defendants are executor and executrix respectively.
The second amended complaint is in two causes…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Ludwicki v. GuerinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Daniels v. BridgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.