Legal Opinion

Kearns v. American Family Insurance Group

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 23, 1992No. C5-91-1785PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Respondents Kimberly Ann Kearns and Lawrence Kearns brought a declaratory judgment action seeking to stack uninsured benefits of separate insurance policies on their two vehicles. The trial court granted the Kearnses’ motion to apply Wisconsin’s stacking statute. American Family’s petition for discretionary review of the order was subsequently denied by this court. The matter proceeded to trial where the jury awarded damages in excess of $100,-000 and found no negligence on the part of Kimberly Ann Kearns. Upon American Family’s post-trial motions for JNOV, a new trial,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Milkovich v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Tahtinen v. MSI InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Myers v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Hague v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nesladek v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API