Barajas v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEERDEN, Justice.
Appellant was convicted of murder, sentenced to life imprisonment and fined $5,000.00.
By three points of error, appellant claims that the trial court erred in limiting both his voir dire examination and closing argument at the guilt-innocence stage to twenty minutes, and asserts jury misconduct for refusing to consider probation in the punishment phase of the trial. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
By his first two points of error, appellant asserts that the time limitations on his voir dire examination and closing argument deprived him of effective assistance…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dugard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- De La Rosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- McWherter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Ratliff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Pennington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tuan Anh Dang v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Baldonado v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
- Madry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Alonzo Joseph Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Dang, Tuan AnhCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.