Ratliff v. State

OPINION

W.C. DAVIS, Judge.

A jury convicted appellant of aggravated robbery and assessed punishment, enhanced by a prior conviction, at confinement for not less than fifteen years nor more than forty years.

In one of his nine grounds of error appellant contends that the trial court erroneously restricted his voir dire examination to the extent that he could not exercise his peremptory challenges intelligently and thus was deprived of effective assistance of counsel.

The court initially advised counsel for the State and counsel for appellant that they each had one hour in which to conduct the voir…