Legal Opinion

Wilbur v. Taylor

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1933No. 23721. En BancPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This, action was based upon a promissory note. The defendants admitted execution of the note, and, by cross-complaint, sought its cancellation and a money judgment against the plaintiff. To the cross-complaint, the plaintiff pleaded certain items of damages for which he sought recovery. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of one dollar. Motion for judgment notwithstanding’ the verdict and, in the alternative, for a new trial being made and overruled, judgment was entered upon the verdict, and the defendants gave notice of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Torgeson v. HanfordWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Dahlstrom v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Wilbur v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mosler v. WoodellWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Kull v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State v. RobyWashington Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API