Wilbur v. Taylor
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This, action was based upon a promissory note. The defendants admitted execution of the note, and, by cross-complaint, sought its cancellation and a money judgment against the plaintiff. To the cross-complaint, the plaintiff pleaded certain items of damages for which he sought recovery. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of one dollar. Motion for judgment notwithstanding’ the verdict and, in the alternative, for a new trial being made and overruled, judgment was entered upon the verdict, and the defendants gave notice of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Torgeson v. HanfordWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Dahlstrom v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Wilbur v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mosler v. WoodellWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Kull v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. RobyWashington Supreme Court · 1953