Legal Opinion
Mosler v. Woodell
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1937No. 26345. Department OnePublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
In the fall of 1932, the defendants Baker and Woodell organized a corporation known as Baker & Woodell, Inc., the sole business of which was the operation of a men’s furnishing shop in the University district, in Seattle. September 6th of that year, the individuals, Baker and Woodell, entered into a contract with QB.S Neon Corporation, Ltd., for the installation of a Neon sign on the premises in which the shop was located.
Throughout the contract, QRS Corporation is referred' to as “Owner” and defendants as “User.” The term of the contract was for thirty-six months from the date of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Madler v. SilverstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Lamson Consol. Store Service Co. v. BowlandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
- Electrical Products Corp. v. MoskoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
- Murray v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- In re Miller Bros. Grocery Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. FarleyWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Ray v. Electrical Products ConsolidatedWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
- Young Electric Sign Company v. CappsIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
- Heath Northwest, Inc. v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- In re Grodnik's, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.