St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Vedatech International, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
This is a consolidated appeal that began as a state court insurance coverage action that was twice removed to federal court. Vedatech International Inc., Vedatech Inc., Vedatech K.K. and pro se defendant Mani Subramanian (collectively “Appellants”) appeal the district court’s remand orders, its order granting attorneys’ fees to St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company (“St.Paul”), its order sanctioning Appellants’ attorney and Subramanian, and its dismissal of Appellants’ claims that arose from a mediation among the parties. We affirm.
1. Standard of Review for Remand Orders
Appella…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mani Subramanian v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Mani Subramanian v. Qad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012