Legal Opinion

Moki Mac River Expeditions v. Drugg

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2007No. 04-0432PublishedCited by 772 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Neill

in which Chief Justice JEFFERSON, Justice HECHT, Justice WAINWRIGHT, Justice BRISTER, Justice GREEN, and Justice WILLETT joined.

A Texas court may assert specific jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant if *573the defendant’s contact with this state is purposeful and the injury arises from or relates to those contacts. In this wrongful-death case against a Utah-based river-rafting outfitter, the defendant contends the plaintiffs death on a Grand Canyon hiking trail did not arise from or relate to its instate commercial activities so as to establish specific jurisdiction over it in Texas. We…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by772 opinions

  1. Kelly v. General Interior Construction, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Retamco Operating, Inc. v. Republic Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Moncrief Oil International, Inc. v. Oao Gazprom, Gazprom Export, LLC, and Gazprom Marketing & Trading, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Spir Star AG v. KimichTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  5. TV Azteca v. RuizTexas Supreme Court · 2016

767 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API