Legal Opinion
Gull Laboratories, Inc. v. Diagnostic Technology, Inc.
District Court, D. Utah
Decided September 19, 1988No. Civ. 86-C-0899APublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALDON J. ANDERSON, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On August 17, 1985, plaintiff Gull Laboratories, Inc. (hereafter “Gull”) and defendant Diagnostic Technology, Inc. (hereafter “DTI”) entered into an agreement whereby Gull granted DTI a non-exclusive license to sell and distribute Gull manufactured products under DTI’s label. The case has undergone extensive discovery and has been set for a trial on several occasions.
During a pre-trial hearing, this court permitted the revival of a motion for summary-judgment…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Nifty Foods Corporation v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. And Pet IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- OFFICE PAVILION SO. FLA. v. ASAL Products, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Henkel v. Lickman (In Re Lickman)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
- Triad Metals, Inc. v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. (In Re Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
- US Magnesium v. PVS ChloralkaliDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025