Henkel v. Lickman (In Re Lickman)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION OR MODIFICATION OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
C. TIMOTHY CORCORAN, III, Bankruptcy Judge.
This adversary proceeding came on for final evidentiary hearing on August 13, 2002, of the Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Preliminary Injunction or for Modification of Preliminary Injunction (Document No. 95) filed by the plaintifjytrustee on July 11, 2002. The motion seeks relief as to the defendants, Paula Lickman and James F. Wiley, III. Mr. Wiley is also the attorney for Ms. Lickman. These defen dants filed three…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Barton v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Glatter v. MrozCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Charles W. GRANT, Ronald Bergwerk, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GEORGE SCHUMANN TIRE & BATTERY COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Stephan Jay Lawrence v. Alan L. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Henkel v. Lickman (In Re Lickman)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
- Henkel v. Lickman (In Re Lickman)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
- Henkel v. Lickman (In Re Lickman)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
- Henkel v. Lickman (In Re Lickman)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2004
- Henkel v. Lickman (In Re Lickman)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.