State v. Blume
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Judge.
The issue presented is whether a magistrate, who entered a judgment of conviction for a misdemeanor and imposed a sentence containing a fine, should have been disqualified later from finding the defendant in contempt for failure to pay the fine. Upon a petition for writ of review, the district court upheld the magistrate’s refusal to be disqualified. Today we affirm.
This case is a chapter in the long-standing dispute between Bill Blume and the State of Idaho over his operation of a barbershop without a license. The dispute arises from Blume’s assertion that state regulation…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. BearshieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- McClenny v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HolcombIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
- City of South Pasadena v. Department of Transp.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- State v. LariosIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. CrismanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992