Legal Opinion

State v. Blume

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 1987No. 16495PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

The issue presented is whether a magistrate, who entered a judgment of conviction for a misdemeanor and imposed a sentence containing a fine, should have been disqualified later from finding the defendant in contempt for failure to pay the fine. Upon a petition for writ of review, the district court upheld the magistrate’s refusal to be disqualified. Today we affirm.

This case is a chapter in the long-standing dispute between Bill Blume and the State of Idaho over his operation of a barbershop without a license. The dispute arises from Blume’s assertion that state regulation…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. State v. BearshieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. McClenny v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HolcombIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. City of South Pasadena v. Department of Transp.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. State v. LariosIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. CrismanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API