Legal Opinion

State v. Holcomb

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1995No. 21077PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

Dean Holcomb entered a conditional plea of guilty to the charge of possession of a controlled substance, I.C. § 37 — 2732(c)(1), reserving his right to appeal from the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, the denial of two motions to dismiss which challenged the sufficiency of the evidence at the preliminary hearing and the sufficiency of the information, and the denial of an alternative motion for a bill of particulars. We conclude the evidence in question was lawfully seized and need not be suppressed, that Holcomb’s motions to dismiss were properly denied, and that a…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. ReyesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. State v. SheldonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State v. Gary L. SchallIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. MorrisIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. SevyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API