City of South Pasadena v. Department of Transp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, J.
For 30 years, the state has attempted to build a freeway through South Pasadena (the City). However, that attempt has been unavailing because the City has refused to enter into freeway agreements required by statute. (See Sts. & Hy. Code, § 100.2; hereafter undesignated code citations are to the Streets and Highways Code.) In 1982, section 100.4 was enacted to allow the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to build the freeway without the City’s consent. However, section 100.4 contained time limitations, requiring Caltrans and the California Transportation Commission…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
- Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Orange County Employees Retirement System Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Carnes v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Ivanoff v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Vann v. Travelers CompaniesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Stewart v. Electrolux Home Prods., Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Hunter v. Pacific Mechanical Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.