Legal Opinion

Monahan v. Toro Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1994No. Civ. A. 92-6843PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DITTER, District Judge.

This case involves a tragic, fatal accident in which a lawn tractor overturned and the plaintiffs wife was killed. The defendant, the Toro Company, moved for summary judgment, asserting that the lawn tractor at issue in this case was not unreasonably dangerous as a matter of law and that Toro was not negligent with respect to the tractor’s design or safety warnings. I heard oral argument on the motion. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is being granted.

I. FACTS

On May 19, 1992, Janice Monahan (“Mrs. Monahan”) was mowing the lawn of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Lewis v. Coffing Hoist Div., Duff-NortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Kleinknecht v. Gettysburg CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Galullo v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Miller v. Group Voyagers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Warnick v. NMC-Wollard, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Riley v. Becton Dickinson Vascular Access, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Berenato v. Seneca Speciality Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API