Legal Opinion
Warnick v. NMC-Wollard, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 8, 2007No. 2:05-cv-01394PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS M. HARDIMAN, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff Gary Warnick (Warnick) brought this negligence and product liability action against Defendants NMC-Wol-lard, Inc. (NMC) and Hobart Brothers Company (Hobart) after he permanently injured his right thumb while working as a baggage handler at Greater Pittsburgh International Airport. Warnick’s wife, Tamara, has sued for loss of consortium. Both NMC and Hobart filed motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and oral argument was heard on January 5, 2007. For the reasons that follow,…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- R.F.M.A.S., Inc. v. SoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- McNeil v. City of EastonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Lynn ex rel. Lynn v. Yamaha Golf-Car Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Sansom v. Crown Equipment Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Nathan v. Techtronic Industries North America, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.