Legal Opinion

Trainor v. Greenough

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Kirk Hawes, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

Eliza A. Greenough, having tne legal title of record to the property in controversy, made a deed to her son, William P. Greenough, of an undivided one-fourth of it. John W. Trainor was in the actual possession of the property, claiming to have a .contract for its purchase. The bill was for the partition of the property and to set aside the claim of Trainor as á cloud upon its title. William P. Greenough and Trainor, and a person with whom Trainor claimed to have made his contract for the purchase of the property, Avere made defendants. No defense Avas interposed on the hearing by any one but…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mott v. SeminaryIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Bradley v. HarknessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Henrichsen v. HodgenIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Danville Seminary v. MottIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Lake v. JareettIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Plummer v. WorthingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Yedor v. Chicago City Bank & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1941
  3. McArthur v. WeidertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  4. Wells v. WellsIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Bevan v. BevanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API