Legal Opinion

Mott v. Seminary

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1889PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Vermilion, county; the Hon. Edward P. Vail, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Magruder

This case was heard upon demurrer to the bill. The demurrer was sustained and the bill was dismissed. Therefore, in considering the questions involved, the allegations of the ' bill are assumed to be true.

The complainants below, who are the appellants here, claim to be the owners of an undivided one third part of the real ■estate, described in the bill, and of which they ask for a partition. They allege that their interest was conveyed to them, ■on March 21, 1888, by Melissa B. Lamon, who is claimed to have been at that time the owner in fee of the whole tract. The .appellees also derive…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nicoll v. . the New-York and Erie Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Life Ass'n of America v. FassettIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Chicago Gas Light & Coke Co. v. People's Gas Light & Coke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Memphis & Charleston Railroad v. NeighborsMississippi Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Ludlow v. New-York & Harlem RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1852

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Los Angeles County Pioneer Society v. Historical SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. North v. GrahamIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. McGee v. VandeventerIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Golconda Northern Railway v. Gulf Lines Connecting RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API