Legal Opinion
Gaer Bros., Inc. v. Mott
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 12, 1957PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
This is an appeal by the named plaintiff from a judgment rendered upon the failure to plead further after demurrers to the complaint were sustained.
The complaint alleged the following: The plaintiff Meyer Caer is an officer of the plaintiff Caer Brothers, Inc., a corporation engaged in the wholesale grocery business. The defendants Joseph P. Mott and Esther M. Mott operate several supermarkets through one or more corporations owned or controlled by them. The defendants Julius Apter and Milton Nahum are attorneys at law practicing their profession in Hartford. On April 23, 1953, Caer Brothers…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters of America v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Local 63, Textile Workers Union of America v. Cheney Bros.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Rutt v. RocheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Bania v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Mills v. MillsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- In Re Arbitration Between Astoria Medical Group & Health Insurance PlanNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Patrick Home Center, Inc. v. KarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Black v. Goodwin, Loomis & Britton, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Nikitiuk v. PishteySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Bennett v. MeaderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.