Legal Opinion
Local 63, Textile Workers Union of America v. Cheney Bros.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 9, 1954PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, C. J.
The judicial phase of the controversy between the parties to this appeal began on January 15, 1953, when the plaintiff, acting under § 8161 (d) of the General Statutes, applied to the Superior Court to vacate an arbitration award rendered against it and in favor of the defendant. The latter filed an answer and a cross application in which correction and confirmation of the award, as corrected, were sought. The court decided that the award ought to be vacated. From the judgment entered thereon the defendant has appealed.
*609The finding, which is not subject to correction, recites the following…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters of America v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Mercury Oil Refining Co. v. Oil Workers International Union, CIO Oil Workers International Union, CIO v. Mercury Oil Refining CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Chase Brass & Copper Co. v. Chase Brass & Copper Workers Union Local 1565Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Pratt, Read & Co. v. United Furniture Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Bodner v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- D & E Construction Co. v. Robert J. Denley Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Dehnart v. Waukesha Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Gaer Bros., Inc. v. MottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.