Legal Opinion
Sc Manufactured Homes, Inc. v. Canyon View Estates, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 15, 2007No. B182088PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
INTRODUCTION
A dealer of mobilehomes alleged it was precluded from selling mobile-homes as a result of a kickback scheme. The dealer sued a number of other mobilehome dealers, as well as a number of mobilehome park managers and owners. After plaintiff dismissed most defendants, the dismissed defendants filed motions for attorney fees and costs pursuant to Civil Code section 798.85, the attorney fees and costs provision of the Mobilehome Residency Law (MRL) (Civ. Code, § 798 et seq.). Section 798.85 permits such awards when the case “aris[es] out of the provisions” of the MRL.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Kasky v. Nike, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Kasky v. Nike, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- SC MANUFACTURED HOMES, INC. v. LiebertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Sequoia Park Associates v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Carpenter & Zuckerman, LLP v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Jensen v. Home Depot, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Simandle v. Vista De Santa Barbara Associates, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.