Legal Opinion

Porter v. Shoemaker

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 1, 1947No. Civ. No. 2723PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks treble damages for violation of price regulations charging defendant with having sold and delivered within a three month period 21287.14 pounds of turkey at overceiling prices.

Defendant claims inability to plead to or prepare a defense against such charge unless the complaint specifies in each sale the price charged, the maximum price, the excess charged, number of pounds, names of purchasers and dates of sale and delivery. Defendant claims the facts set forth are meaningless.

Plaintiff answers the facts are purely within defendant’s knowledge, that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Timetrust, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1939
  3. Sierocinski v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  4. Brinley v. LewisDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. United States v. SchuchhardtDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sunbeam Corp. v. Payless Drug StoresDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
  2. Blackham v. SnelgroveUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Burr v. ChildsUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State ex rel. Papin Builders, Inc. v. LitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Turkish State Railways Administration v. Vulcan Iron WorksDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API