Legal Opinion
Blackham v. Snelgrove
Utah Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1955No. 8170PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORTPIEN, Justice.
Appeal from an order of dismissal for failure of plaintiff’s complaint to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
The only material facts, accordingly, are the averments in plaintiff’s complaint:
“1. That the defendant A. M. Snel-grove during all times mentioned herein was and now is, City Recorder and Clerk of the City of Provo, State of Utah.
“2. [That defendant American Surety Company of New York is a corporation authorized to do business in Utah.]
“3. [Allegations of defendant Snel-grove’s execution of his official bond with the defendant surety company as surety.]
“4.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Wilson v. OldroydUtah Supreme Court · 1954
- Porter v. ShoemakerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- Seamons v. ANDERSONUtah Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- MacK v. Utah State Department of CommerceUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Williams v. State Farm Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
- Fishbaugh v. Utah Power & LightUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Farm Bureau Insurance Company v. ClintonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Christopher v. Larson Ford Sales, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.