Legal Opinion
People v. Hale
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 10, 1999PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rosenblatt, J.
As a condition of probation in connection with a negotiated plea and sentence, defendant consented in writing to provisions permitting his probation officer to search his person, his vehicle, and his “place of abode” for illegal drugs and narcotic implements, during the period of probation. Claiming that his. consent is legally inoperative, defendant asserts that the search provision is violative of his constitutional and statutory rights. We disagree, and hold that the provision served as a lawful basis for the seizure of evidence resulting in the charges on…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- People v. BravoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- United States v. Hector B. GermosenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- People v. LetterloughNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. OskrobaNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- People v. JacobAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. HakesNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
- People v. GrantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- People v. DranchukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.