Legal Opinion

State v. Tanner

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 2, 1975No. 7410SC1062PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

Case No. 74CR16956

Defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial court to instruct that § 15-21 of the Raleigh Code, proscribing the firing of a gun within the city limits, is not violated if the gun is fired in defense of person or property. G.S. 160A-189 grants cities authority to regulate, restrict, or prohibit by ordinance “the discharge of firearms at any time or place within the city except when used in defense of person or property or pursuant to lawful directions of law-enforcement officers, and may regulate the display of firearms on the streets, sidewalks,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. SummrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. PeeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. AveryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spratt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. State v. FurrCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. GuntherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API