Legal Opinion

State v. Furr

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 1975No. 7526SC151PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

With commendable candor, the State calls our attention to the following portion of the trial court’s instruction with respect to the charge of discharging a firearm into an occupied building:

“Members of the jury, the defendant is also charged with discharging a firearm into an occupied building. Now, I charge that for you to find the defendant guilty of discharging a firearm into occupied property, the State must prove three things beyond a reasonable doubt. First, that the defendant intentionally and without justification or excuse discharged a shotgun into the Speedway Lounge;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. TannerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ElmquistNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State v. JamesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API