Spratt v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKWELL, Judge.
While the crime of malicious destruction of property has been traditionally recognized at common law as one criminal offense, 1 Maryland has codified the offense so that for many purposes it is treated as two separate crimes based upon the value of the property destroyed. 2 This gradation became effective as of July 1, 1985. Under the new statutory scheme, it is the responsibility of the State to specify and prove the value of the property destroyed to establish the proper classification of the offense. It is essential for the trier of fact to determine value where it is…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Stanley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Felkner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Dean v. PinderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Morris v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Hagans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Graham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Marquardt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.