Legal Opinion

UAW v. Green

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 15, 2013No. Docket No. 314781PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, P.J.

I. INTRODUCTION

As an intermediate appellate court, we typically decide appeals of orders issued by lower courts. But here, the Legislature placed in this Court exclusive original jurisdiction over challenges to 2012 PA 349 (PA 349), colloquially called a “right to work” law. MCL 423.210(6). PA 349 amends the public employment relations act (PERA), MCL 423.201 et seq.,1 and states that public employers — that is, the government— cannot require governmental employees to join a union or pay union dues, fees, or other expenses “as a condition of obtaining or continuing public employment. .. .”…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station EmployesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rusha v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Uaw v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Coalition Protecting Auto No-Fault v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. David Samona v. the City of Eastpointe MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Uaw v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API