Coalition Protecting Auto No-Fault v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'n
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBorrello, J.
Defendant, the Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association (MCCA), appeals by leave granted a December 26, 2012 trial court order granting partial summary disposition in favor of plaintiffs, the Coalition Protecting Auto No-Fault and others, pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8), and denying the MCCA’s motion for sum*304mary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(8) and MCR 2.116(C)(10). Plaintiffs cross-appeal the same order. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we reverse and remand for entry of an order awarding summary disposition in favor of the MCCA.
I. BACKGROUND
This action involves plaintiffs’ requests…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Center for National Security Studies v. U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- McCORMICK v. CARRIERMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Coalition Protecting Auto No-Fault v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- Coalition Protecting Auto No-Fault v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
- Coalition Protecting Auto No-Fault v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016