Budds v. Frey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis in forcible entry and unlawful detainer. The answer was a general denial. The case was tried before Waite, J., who made findings and as conclusion of law found defendant guilty o'f wrongful detention of the premises and that plaintiffs are entitled to immediate restitution. From the judgment entered pursuant to the findings, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
ELLIOTT, J
On April- 1, 1902, William J. Godfrey was the owner of a certain addition to the city of Minneapolis, known as “Godfrey’s Bridal Veil Block,” in which there was a subdivision known as block 1, lot 2, thereof. On that date Godfrey by a parol agreement leased a certain portion of block 1, lot 2, to the appellant, Frey. The term of the lease was from quarter to quarter from and after April 1, 1902, and the lessee agreed to pay a rental of $80 per year, payable quarterly, in advance, on the first days of January, April, July, and October of each year. When the lease was made there were…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Taylor v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Stewart v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Higgins v. HalliganIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Parkinson v. BrandenburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Petsch v. BiggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mogaard v. City of GarrisonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
- Texas Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Bank of Dassel v. MarchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Mannheimer v. PhinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Oesterreicher v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.