Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1896No. Nos. 9902-(178)PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Petition in the district court for Stevens county for the purpose of acquiring the right, privilege, and easement of erecting and operating a public grain elevator on a site on the right of way of respondent railway company. The petition came on for hearing and assessment of damages before C. L. Brown, J., and a jury.

Read the full summary

Petition in the district court for Stevens county for the purpose of acquiring the right, privilege, and easement of erecting and operating a public grain elevator on a site on the right of way of respondent railway company. The petition came on for hearing and assessment of damages before C. L. Brown, J., and a jury. The jury assessed the rental and compensation for the lands sought to be taken at one dollar per year, and in gross for the full term of 20 years at $20, and the findings and order of the court were in favor of petitioner, and from a judgment entered in pursuance thereof…

1Opinion of the Court

START, C. J.2

The petitioner (the respondent herein), for the purpose of acquiring the right, privilege, and easement of erecting and operating a public grain elevator for the public, for hire, upon a site on the right of way of the appellant railway company, presented to *516it an application therefor on June 7, 1894. The application was denied, and thereupon the petitioner, on June 29, 1894, presented to the district court his petition for condemnation of such right and easement, under the provisions of Laws 1898, c. 64 (G-. S. 1894, §§ 7724-7729). Such proceedings were had upon such petition…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Budd v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Brass v. North Dakota Ex Rel. StoeserSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Rippe v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Baldwin v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Visina v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. State ex rel. Utick v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  3. Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. Grover Irrigation & Land Co. v. Lovella Ditch, Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Portneuf Irrigating Co. v. BudgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1909

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API