Legal Opinion

Caruso v. Pierce

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided May 19, 1972No. 65760PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCovett, J.

This is an action in contract to recover a deposit of $3,000.00 given by the plaintiffs to the defendant as a deposit on the purchase of property owned by one defendant and located at 67 to 71 Summer Street, Malden, Massachusetts. .

The plaintiffs’ declaration contained four counts. Counts 1 and 2 were for money had and received and Counts 3 and 4 were for the recovery of a deposit made on a written contract. The defendant’s answer contained a general denial, payment and the statute of limitations.

There was evidence that the plaintiffs were desirous of buying a building at 67-71 Summer Street,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bucholz v. Green Bros. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Imperiali v. PicaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Ficara v. BelleauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  4. Okin v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. F. A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co. v. HartneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. Unihab, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API