Legal Opinion

Bridgman v. Stout

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 10, 1971PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPort, J.

This case presents the problem of whether or not a common-law marriage was entered into in the state of Ohio between the plaintiff, Catherine H. Bridgman, and Reynold Lee Stout, now deceased. The trial court found against the plaintiff, and she appeals.

Plaintiff and Stout began living together as husband and wife in Oregon late in 1947 or early in 1948. At that time each was lawfully married to another. Plaintiff obtained a divorce from her prior husband in May 1948 and Stout was divorced by his wife in February 1949. Plaintiff’s four children remained with her, while Stout’s only child,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Huard v. McTeighOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  2. In Re Estate of RedmanOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Boykin v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Estate of McKannaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Boltz v. BoltzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of BookerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. Bridgman v. StoutCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  3. Crittenden v. HannaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Estate of BookerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API