Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Redman
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 14, 1939No. 27463PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The sole question presented in this case is whether there was a common-law marriage between the parties. The essential elements of a common-law marriage in this' state were announced in the case of Umbenhower v. Labus, 85 Ohio St., 238, 97 N. E., 832. The following essential requirements for such a marriage are stated in the syllabus of that case:
“An agreement of marriage in praesenti when made by párties competent to contract, accompanied and followed by cohabitation as husband and wife, they being so treated and reputed in the community and circle in which they move,…
2Cited by23 opinions
- In Re Estate of SoederOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
- Gloria YOUNG; Alicia Young; Nicholas Young, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Markley v. HudsonOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- United States v. GobleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Nestor v. NestorOhio Supreme Court · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.