Legal Opinion

Huard v. McTeigh

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1925PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

The principal question for decision in this case is the validity of the alleged marriage between the parties hereto, as we concede, in keeping with the findings of the trial court, that the defendant has by a preponderance of testimony established her allegations of cruel and inhuman treatment. The decree as rendered in the court- below is necessarily predicated upon the premise of a valid marriage. If there was not a valid marriage between these parties, it follows that there could not be a dissolution of the same. We cannot dissolve that which in fact does not exist. It is necessary in this…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Grigsby v. ReibTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Meister v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Hutchins v. KimmellMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Travers v. ReinhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Offield v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Wadsworth v. BrighamOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Roberts v. RobertsWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  3. In Re Estate of SoederOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Crouse v. StoppsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  5. In Re Stopp's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API