Legal Opinion

Bridgman v. Stout

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 8, 1972No. 27115Published

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

Defendant Rosario A. Stout in her individual capacity appeals from a judgment declaring that plaintiff Catherine H. Bridgman is the exclusive owner of certain real property located in Yamhill County. The plaintiff and decedent R. L. Stout acquired the property at a time while they were living together, purportedly as husband and wife. The deed by which they took title conveyed to them as “Reynold L. Stout and Catherine H. Stout, husband and wife.” In a previous case involving the same parties to this appeal, we held that plaintiff and decedent were not common law husband and wife, Bridgman v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Erickson v. EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Hunter v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Merit v. LoseyOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Emmons v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Bridgman v. StoutCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API