Legal Opinion

Johnk v. Union Pacific Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1916No. 18860PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Coif ax county: Conrad Hollenbeck, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

This was an action in equity to restrain the defendants from ” restoring the waters of a natural watercourse, known as Shell creek, to their former channel. The flow had become diverted so as to abandon the natural channel, and by means of a ditch, known as the Bailey ditch, reached another ditch parallel to the line of the Union Pacific Railroad Company and close to its track. Shell creek rises in Boone county and flows in a southeasterly direction into the Platte river. Por a distance of almost six or seven miles it flows almost parallel to the track of the railroad company. At one point in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kray v. MuggliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Roe v. Howard CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Town v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Pyle v. RichardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Ford v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mader v. MettenbrinkNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Stolting v. EverettNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Mitchell Drainage District v. Farmers Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Shepardson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Whipple v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API