Legal Opinion
Pinel v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 30, 2011No. Case C 10-03118 SBAPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
Plaintiff Maritza Pinel (“Plaintiff’) filed the instant class action on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated to challenge the allegedly unfair and unlawful business practices of Defendant Aurora Loan Services, LLC (“Aurora”) with respect to its use of mortgage “Workout Agreements.” The Court has subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d).
The parties are presently before the Court on Aurora’s Motion to Dismiss…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mireles v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Tan v. Grubhub, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Casault v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Flores v. JohnsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Marino v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.